|
The number is the market’s question. The Chair already hinted at his answer
In about an hour, at 8:30 this morning, the government releases the inflation number the whole market has been waiting for. Everyone is treating it as the report that decides whether the Federal Reserve raises interest rates next week. There is just one problem with that framing: the man who actually makes the decision has already told you the number might not change his mind.
His name is Kevin Warsh, and he chairs the Fed. Last month, at the annual gathering of central bankers in Jackson Hole, he was handed a summer of better-than-expected inflation readings, the kind of cooling data that usually lets a central banker declare progress. Instead he said, in plain words, that those readings did not tell him underlying trends had meaningfully improved. Read that again, because it was spoken before today’s number even existed. The Chair looked at good inflation news and said, in effect, I am not convinced.
That stance changes how you should read this morning. The consensus expects consumer prices rose about 0.4 percent in August, putting the yearly rate near 3.4 percent, with the core measure that strips out food and energy running around 2.4 percent. If the number comes in soft, the instinct across the market will be immediate relief: inflation is cooling, the Fed can back off, stocks rally. And that relief may well show up on your screen in the first hour of trading. But a rally built on a soft number runs straight into a Chair who told a room full of economists that soft numbers this summer did not move him.
That gap is the trap in today’s report. The market may celebrate at 9:30 and find the Fed unmoved at its meeting five days later. It is the difference between what the data says and what the person deciding has already decided to believe, and it is wider this month than usual, because the Chair drew the line in public before the data arrived. Add in oil back at 100 dollars and yesterday’s wholesale inflation at 5.4 percent, and one cool consumer reading, after a summer of them he already dismissed, is a thin reed to hang a relief rally on.
Now bring it home, because this is not an abstraction about central banking. The Fed decides next Wednesday, and whatever it does flows into your life. A hike, or even a signal that hikes are still coming, keeps mortgage rates high, keeps car loans expensive, and pressures the value of the bonds in a retirement account. A soft reading this morning might tempt you to act as if the all-clear has sounded, to move up a refinance, add risk, or reach for yield. Warsh just told you not to trust that all-clear yet, and he is the one whose opinion sets the rate.
So what does a steady hand do on a morning like this. It watches the number, but it weights the words of the person who decides more heavily than the market’s first reaction to the data. Do not trade the 8:30 print, because the opening move is often a head fake that reverses once the details are read. If the number is hot, the hike case hardens and everyone knows it. If it is soft, resist the urge to treat it as the end of the story, because the Chair has already sketched a different ending. Let the number land, let the first hour of noise pass, and keep your eyes on Wednesday. None of this is investment advice.
The report at 8:30 is the market’s question. The Fed’s answer comes Wednesday, and the Chair has spent a month telling you not to assume you already know it. Watch the number, but listen to the man who votes.
|
