|
The Pattern Is Not That Hikes Hurt Stocks. The Pattern Is That the Fed Always Goes Further.
February 4, 1994. Alan Greenspan raised the federal funds rate by 25 basis points. It was the first increase in five years. Markets expected a slow, mild tightening to maybe 4.25% by mid-1995. The Fed went to 6% in 12 months. Bond losses topped $600 billion by the third quarter, per Fortune. The 30-year Treasury yield surged above 8%. Mortgage rates jumped more than 30%. Orange County filed for bankruptcy. The S&P 500 finished the year with a real return of negative 1.1%, per Motley Fool.
The stock market did not crash. It ground sideways for a year while bonds were destroyed. A 60/40 portfolio posted its worst return in a decade. Vanguard later calculated that 60/40 portfolios during periods when rates rose at least 200 basis points averaged negative real returns over the following twelve months. The damage was not dramatic. It was quiet and cumulative. The kind that shows up in your account statement six months after you stopped paying attention.
The Surprise Is Always the Distance. In every tightening cycle since 1994, Fed Funds futures substantially underestimated how far the Fed would go, per Benzinga’s analysis of CME data. In 1994 the gap was 175 basis points. In 1999 it was roughly 125 basis points. In 2004 it was 255 basis points. In 2022 futures initially priced six hikes and the Fed delivered eleven. The market always knows a hike is coming. It never knows how many.
This matters for what happens next. Right now CME FedWatch prices a single December 2026 hike at roughly 50%. Polymarket puts any 2026 hike at 34%. If the pattern holds, the market is underpricing the Fed again. Not because traders are naive but because the Fed responds to data that has not arrived yet. Core PCE came in at 4.3% in the Q1 advance estimate, the highest since 2023. If Thursday’s GDP revision holds that number or pushes it higher, the rate-hike path the April minutes described becomes the consensus path by July.
What Each Cycle Teaches. 1994 teaches that bonds take the first hit and the hit is severe. Stocks grind. The pain is in the 40% of your portfolio, not the 60%. 1999 teaches that the bear market can arrive nine months after the first hike, long after the market has decided the hikes do not matter. 2004 teaches that stocks can rise for years during a hiking cycle and still collapse once the lagged effects reach the real economy. The delay between the last 2006 hike and the 2008 crash was 14 months. 2022 teaches what happens when stocks and bonds fall together: the 60/40 portfolio lost 17.5%, its worst year since 1937, per Morgan Stanley.
Where That Leaves You. The S&P 500 closed Friday at 7,473.47, its eighth straight weekly gain. The Shiller CAPE ratio is 41.6, the second-highest in 140 years. The 10-year yield is 4.55%. The 30-year is above 5%. The FOMC has four dissenters and a majority that said “policy firming would likely become appropriate.” Deutsche Bank’s study of 13 hiking cycles since 1955 found that the S&P 500 averaged a 7.7% gain in the first year. Then it went sideways for over 12 months before resuming its advance two years in. The early innings tend to be fine. The middle innings are where the damage compounds.
What to Watch in Your Own Portfolio. If you are sitting in a 60/40 with long-duration bonds, the 1994 and 2022 cycles say your fixed-income side takes the hit first. Short-duration Treasurys and money markets paying above 4% carry less exposure to that risk. If you are fully in equities, the 1999 and 2004 cycles say the pain arrives late, not early. The market may rally for months after the first hike. The question is never whether you should sell. It is whether you know what you own and how long you can hold it through the middle innings.
Four cycles. Four times the Fed went further than anyone priced. The market always gets the direction right and the distance wrong. That is the pattern worth remembering as the FOMC prints its first rate-hike language in four years. The question this week is not whether a hike is coming. It is how far behind the market already is.
|
